HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1998 0715 CC REG ITEM 10B3 o� . �o ( mss)
ITEM 0.0.
CITY OF MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT City Council Meeting
'1. 15 • 9a
TO: The Honorable City Council ACTION:A-dont ed jQeSo . �Jo.
FROM: Donald P. Reynolds Jr., Administrative Services Manager
BY: � �A-
DATE: July 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Consider Revisions to the City's Police Service Rates and False Alarm Billing
Rate
Summary
The following report requests Council consideration for an increase to the City's rate charged
for police services, and an increase to the City's flat rate for false alarm billings (adoption of
the Resolution provided in Attachment "A "). These increases are a reflection of increases
passed to the City from the County of Ventura Sheriffs department. The last revisions to the
service rate was made in January 1997, and the last revision to the false alarm billing rate
was made in 1993.
Service Rates
The City established rates for police services with the adoption of Resolution 92 -868, on July
15, 1992. This resolution adopted police rates for the purpose of recovering all City costs
associated with the review and development of permit conditions associated with new
development projects, traffic control, crowd control, inspection of special events, emergency
responses and other specific police related services. The requirement to advertise and hold a
public meeting prior to adopting or increasing development fees, (Government Code 66061),
is not applicable because these fees only apply to the recovery of costs related to government
regulatory action or approvals. This fee will apply specifically to the review of a development
plan by the Community Services Officer in the Police Department, the development of
temporary use permit conditions for special events (including such applications as film
permits, carnivals, and craft fairs), staffing special events, and emergency cost recovery,
when the emergency is caused by an illegal activity and can be collected through the District
Attorney's Office.
Resolution 92 -686 based the cost of the Police Service Rate on the following elements:
County Sheriffs direct cost to the City, or base rate; a portion of the support staff costs; the
facility costs; equipment, and; contract management. When calculating "all" costs, the cost
generally rose to more than 100% of the cost charged to the City for special event
applications. Since 1992, this approach has not changed. The City has only increased the
service rate by the percentage increase which occurs annually to the base contract rate
charged to the City. These are the increases shown in Attachment "B."
False Alarm Billing Rate
The police respond to alarms related to buildings and structures on a routine basis and
000140
occasionally these occur as a result of human or equipment failure, and not from a crime in
progress or illegal entry. Currently, after the third false alarm in any 365 day period, a fifty
dollar fee is charged, increasing up to $500 per response as needed. Each time a false alarm
occurs, a new twelve month period beings.
A review of the False Alarm billing rates in Section "2" of Exhibit "A" of the resolution, includes
both the average increase in police contract rates over since 1993, and compared the flat
rates applied in other neighboring cities. The sum of the average increase in police contract
rates since 1993 equals 12.47°/x. The City of Camarillo does not have this fee. Thousand
Oaks applies a $55 rate after the third response in the calendar year, then $110, and $150
with a $550 cap. Simi Valley applies a $74 rate after five false alarms in any 365 consecutive
day period, adding $74 to each thereafter. Staff is recommending a ten percent increase,
from $50 to $55, and an increase of the cap from $500 to $550, which is the same as the
current rate applied in Thousand Oaks.
Recommendation
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 98- establishing approval of Police Service
Fees for FY 1998/99, and rescinding Resolution No. 97 -1273.
Attachment: A) Resolution No. 98-
B) Rate Calculation
r
000.1,p
RESOLUTION 98 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING APPROVAL OF POLICE SERVICE FEES
AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 97- 1273
WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the City to establish fees for City police services which
are not of benefit nor the responsibility of the - public -at- large; and
WHEREAS, the City contracts for police services with the County of Ventura; and
WHEREAS, the City uses police personnel for development plan review, traffic control,
crowd control, special event permit review, inspection, emergency responses and other police
services from time -to -time; and
WHEREAS, these services are for the benefit of or precipitated by the actions of private
individuals or companies and the expense is not appropriately the responsibility of the public -at-
large;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. All police service fees and charges shall be reviewed and updated annually
by the department as part of the budget process to ensure that they are current and are related to
actual cost.
SECTION 2. That City Resolution 97 -1273 is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby approves the fee schedule attached as Exhibit
"A" - Police Service Fees.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this th day of July, 1998.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk
000142
A.
EXHIBIT A
POLICE SERVICE FEES
POLICE SERVICES (PER HOLM
COST
OVER -TIME
CAPTAIN
$129
N/A
SERGEANT
$ 87
$106
SENIOR DEPUTY
$ 68
$ 87
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
$ 99
$ 104
DEPUTY
$ 66
$ 75
CADET
$ 26
$ 26
These fees include departmental support costs and general government overhead.
B. FALSE ALARM RESPONSES WITHIN ANY PERIOD OF TWELVE 412 1
CONSECUTIVE MONTHS
THIRD RESPONSE
$ 55
FOURTH RESPONSE
$110
FIFTH RESPONSE
$165
EACH ADDITIONAL $110 more than the previous charge, up to
a maximum of $550
C. PENALTY FOR LATE PAYMENT
A penalty fee in the amount of ten percent (10 %) shall be added each month to any fee
imposed in the event the fee is not paid within thirty (3) days after the billing date.
1)00143
POLICE RATES STRAIGHT TIME
LT /CAPT
SGT.
SR. DEPI
ATTACHMENT "B"
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
1993/94 -% INCREASE 1994/95 % INCREASE 1995/96 % INCREASE 1996/97 % INCREASE
100 5.9600% 102 - 1.20190/o 101 23.9437% 125 3.2909%
78 1.9800% 80 4.6711% 84 3.5918% 87 0.5739%
63 2.1300% 64 0.0759% 66 3.6542% 68 2.9176%
76 2.5800% 77 3.1169% 79 - 2.6379% 81 4.22460/6
1997/98
POLICE RATES OVERTIME
C
O
N
rP
LT /CAPT.
FISCAL YEAR
1996/97
SGT.
SR.DEPUTY
CSO
DEPUTY
CADET
POLRAT98.WK4
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
1993/94 % INCREASE 1994/95 % INCREASE 1995/96 % INCREASE 1996/97
% INCREASE
FISCAL YEAR
1996/97
N/A
0.0000%
N/A
0.0000%
0
0.0000%
0
0.0000%
0
95
1.9800%
97
5.3446%
102
3.5918%
106
0.5739%
1 Q6
2.1300%
.
76
78
4.30730/.
81
3.6542%
84
2.91760/o
87
2.5800%
92
94
3.1105%
97
2.6379%
99
4.2246%
104
3.1200%
68
70
3.3279%
72
3.7793%
75
0.5582%
: 75
30
2.0300%
31
-2.6441%
30
1.8802%
31
-1.3671%
30